<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>WAPS.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waps.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waps.org</link>
	<description>Wisconsin Association of Personnel Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/3.0.1" -->
	<itunes:summary>Wisconsin Association of Personnel Services</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>WAPS.org</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.waps.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Wisconsin Association of Personnel Services</itunes:subtitle>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Listen to the Ask The Expert Radio Podcast Series</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2012/05/listen-to-the-ask-the-expert-radio-podcast-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2012/05/listen-to-the-ask-the-expert-radio-podcast-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Staudacher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask The Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To offer more value to our members we have launched our Ask The Expert Radio Podcast series.  This is a series of audio interviews with recruiting industry experts where we touch on and have discussions about topics that are important to our members and our recruiting community. WAPS members can log in and listen to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To offer more value to our members we have launched our Ask The Expert Radio Podcast series.  This is a series of audio interviews with recruiting industry experts where we touch on and have discussions about topics that are important to our members and our recruiting community.</p>
<p>WAPS members can log in and listen to our Q&amp;A series we recently recorded with Mark Rowbottom.  Go to <a title="Ask The Expert" href="http://www.waps.org/2011/09/asked-the-expert/">Ask The Expert</a> for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2012/05/listen-to-the-ask-the-expert-radio-podcast-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask The Expert Radio Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2012/04/ask-the-expert-radio-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2012/04/ask-the-expert-radio-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Staudacher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To find out more about our &#8220;Ask The Expert&#8221; listen to our interview.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To find out more about our &#8220;Ask The Expert&#8221; <a title="Ask The Expert" href="http://www.waps.org/ask-the-expert/">listen to our interview.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2012/04/ask-the-expert-radio-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Phelps receives rave reviews for his LinkedIn Training</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2012/01/michael-phelps-receives-rave-reviews-for-his-linkedin-training/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2012/01/michael-phelps-receives-rave-reviews-for-his-linkedin-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Staudacher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Phelps hit one out of the park for WAPS.  All those who attended his LinkedIn training were very satisfied with his presentation.  He gave a step by step presentation on why and how to implement a comprehensive LinkedIn strategy. If you missed the training on January 4th you can now purchase the video presentation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Phelps hit one out of the park for WAPS.  All those who attended his LinkedIn training were very satisfied with his presentation.  He gave a step by step presentation on why and how to implement a comprehensive LinkedIn strategy.</p>
<p>If you missed the training on January 4th you can now purchase the <a title="Advanced Linkedin Training Video: Michael Phelps" href="http://www.waps.org/january-4th-2011-advanced-linkedin-training-with-michael-phelps/">video presentation</a> to take advantage of this incredible training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2012/01/michael-phelps-receives-rave-reviews-for-his-linkedin-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Fire Someone For What They Say On Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/can-you-fire-someone-for-what-they-say-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/can-you-fire-someone-for-what-they-say-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Staudacher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Media and other related technologies that publish information for the world to see are causing problems for both candidates and clients.  See what employment attorney Lisa Yankowitz has to say about this. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Media and other related technologies that publish information for the world to see are causing problems for both candidates and clients.  See what employment attorney <a href="http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=yzmdfccab&amp;v=001Msfh5C4b-acHlER0NAWA5teaJIKUTlKDMJZCpGGSlPiPdWwY7qBUDYSF_--qKOEwEzLkFkbV4KghJnilqAc2dnl3Dc4akQwaTWRYD8MfXxPMETiboufSEg-E_6i69uaub_Pwnzuw6JKLb1FE6tYtLhx7XXZVEmgH2Hcb2gVFa8AW0vChYkM9MAMv6Os3EVoy">Lisa Yankowitz</a> has to say about this.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/can-you-fire-someone-for-what-they-say-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greg Doersching</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/greg-doersching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/greg-doersching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Altstadt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope a lot of WAPS members are as fired up as I am for Greg Doersching&#8217;s presentation on November 2nd.  We haven&#8217;t seen Greg since the Summer classes he held in 2009.  I&#8217;m 3/4 of the way through the best year I&#8217;ve had in nearly 3 years &#38; I feel strongly that Greg&#8217;s training will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope a lot of WAPS members are as fired up as I am for Greg Doersching&#8217;s presentation on November 2nd.  We haven&#8217;t seen Greg since the Summer classes he held in 2009.  I&#8217;m 3/4 of the way through the best year I&#8217;ve had in nearly 3 years &amp; I feel strongly that Greg&#8217;s training will help me to a strong finish to to 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/greg-doersching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen to our interview with Greg Doersching</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/listen-to-our-interview-with-greg-doersching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/listen-to-our-interview-with-greg-doersching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Staudacher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen to our interview with Greg Doersching as he previews his Back To Basics Training program on November 2nd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Interview with Greg Doersching" href="http://new.waps.org/">Listen</a> to our interview with Greg Doersching as he previews his Back To Basics Training program on November 2nd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/listen-to-our-interview-with-greg-doersching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Expert : 180 Day Guarantee?</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-180-day-guarantee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-180-day-guarantee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowbottom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask The Expert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ASK THE EXPERT:  By Mark Rowbottom. My client wants a 180 day guarantee.  How do I respond?  The client tells me that other recruiters agree to this.  This is an opportunity to differentiate you and your company from the others.  This is an opportunity for you to qualify the client.  Express understanding of their desire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>ASK THE EXPERT:  By Mark Rowbottom.</p>
<p>My client wants a 180 day guarantee.  How do I respond?  The client tells me that other recruiters agree to this.  This is an opportunity to differentiate you and your company from the others.  This is an opportunity for you to qualify the client.  Express understanding of their desire to minimize risks.<br />
Then, ask some leading questions.</p>
<ul>
<li>Have the other recruiters delivered quality candidates?</li>
<li>Has this happened at their company in the past/recently?</li>
<li>Is there a pattern of people leaving within the 1st six months of employment?</li>
<li>Why would people want to leave your company?</li>
</ul>
<p>Demonstrate your success.  We have several people that have been employed for 10+ years with our clients.  This is why our clients continue to work with us.  This is why you should work with us.  Good hires/candidates don’t quit within 6 months.</p>
<p>Discuss the possibility of a potential renewal fee for each year beyond the guarantee.  Renewal fees for superior people or a bonus fee when people are promoted.</p>
<p>Restate your understanding of their desire to minimize risks.  State your responsibility for providing quality candidates.  Recruiting(your responsibility) and retention(their responsibility) are separate issues.</p>
<p>Examples:    Suicide    Inheritance    Wrongful Death    Family Issues</p>
<p>Guarantee them a great hire, great service and let them know how you/your firm will minimize the chances of a bad hire.<br />
Reassure them your firm will stay in touch with any hire beyond a 30 day guarantee.</p>
<p>Reasons you will stay in touch are:</p>
<ol>
<li>You become a good confidant and many times, friends, with your people.</li>
<li>To make sure the client is holding up their end of the bargain or honors the</li>
<li>promises they have made.</li>
<li>You want to insure they have their desks, computer, parking spot, etc.</li>
<li>Guarantee Great Service!</li>
<li>Use the opportunity to test your client and get the best job order you can.</li>
</ol>
<p>You may be dodging a bullet.</p>
<p><em>What is your problem?  I know you have one:)</em></p>
<p>Please email you problem to:  <a href="mailto:mark@rowbottom.com">Mark Rowbottom</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/a5cb1d8a71b78914b785a370a689be49?d=wavatar&amp;s=70" alt="" width="70" height="70" /></div>
<div></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-180-day-guarantee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask the Expert: Should we use a pre-search form?</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-should-we-use-a-pre-search-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-should-we-use-a-pre-search-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowbottom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask The Expert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask the Expert                                       By Mark Rowbottom   I just spent an hour on the phone with a candidate who looked really good on paper, only to find out at the end that she&#8217;d already been submitted to a bunch of other companies by another recruiter. Do you use any pre-screening forms on the front end [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ask the Expert                                       By Mark Rowbottom</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
I just spent an hour on the phone with a candidate who looked really good on paper, only to find out at the end that she&#8217;d already been submitted to a bunch of other companies by another recruiter. Do you use any pre-screening forms on the front end of your process to prevent stuff like this from happening?</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The simple answer is <strong>YES!!</strong> – we absolutely do use a pre-search form. We use the form for a variety of reasons, and after explaining the reasoning behind it &#8211; we believe you will too.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In order to provide great service to our clients, we ask a variety of key questions taking a JO and then do our research on the company. This research can include department size, Org charts, benefits and on ……….</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ironically, when recruiting candidates for our clients we can be less thorough. This is the scenario you fell into when you wasted an hour on a “spent” candidate.  Don’t feel bad – we have all done it before. You said in your question “a candidate who looked <strong><em>really good</em></strong> on paper.” Recruiters tend to get very excited when they think they have a candidate “<em>on the line</em>”.  Asking the tough questions upfront can be a scary proposition, you could “<em>lose the fish</em>”!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Exactly!!! That is the reason to ask them. If candidates are unwilling to reveal information about their search, you should not work with them. However, give them a chance to help you understand their career expectations. We do that with our candidates through the “<strong>Advantage Form!”</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There are several bonuses with what we call our “Advantage Form.” We encourage the completion of our form as a smart move for our candidates. The Advantages are multiple. The form asks the questions “what is the ideal job, ideal salary, location, benefits and duties? We can learn about their needs and desires in a new company. Remember – it is all about the candidates <em>(and the clients</em><em>)</em>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Let your candidate know the form will provide you with the information to help you identify the right fit.  Time will be saved by identifying the candidate’s preferences once the form is completed. Explain to them how the form is an in-house tool and is held in confidentiality. Tell them it will take about 15 minutes to complete, and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ask them when they will be able to complete it. Finally, promise to call them on that date. </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Your form should ask for details describing their search activity. This should include: other recruiters, interviews, job offers, job board listings and related search activities. Start the form with easy factual things to get them started: follow with the “ideal” questions and on a second page <strong>ask for references</strong>. Limit the form to 6 or 7 key questions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What you want are the facts in a direct concise form.  <strong><em>While a resume may make a candidate look good – it does not necessarily make the individual a good candidate.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-should-we-use-a-pre-search-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask The Expert : Vendor Agreement &#8211; HR</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-vendor-agreement-hr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-vendor-agreement-hr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rowbottom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask The Expert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask the Expert : By Mark Rowbottom &#160; I need to set the situation for you. 2 years ago, a  great client implemented a Vendor Management program (VMP) for their recruiters. The HR department brought us and many other recruiters in – asked for pricing breaks in exchange for being one of a “limited” number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask the Expert : By Mark Rowbottom</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I need to set the situation for you. 2 years ago, a  great client implemented a Vendor Management program (<strong>VMP</strong>) for their recruiters. The HR department brought us and many other recruiters in – asked for pricing breaks in exchange for being one of a “limited” number of firms with access to work on their positions. The goal being twofold: To reduce expenses and get “control” of the agencies running amok with Managers. It became a bidding war, and the low price (poor quality) firms accepted lousy terms (19% &#8211; long guarantees, 60 net). We were offered to be one of these firms, but politely declined. We had placed many people there who had become managers, and stayed in contact with them – keeping everything positive. After the other firms failed to fill the hard positions – they would release them to us at 25%. Essentially giving us the jobs that had been picked over and anyone would now have access to fill, we again respectfully declined these &#8220;opportunities&#8221; and did not really work on it – but <em>stayed in touch</em> selling the retainer concept.</p>
<p>9 months later, we got an $8,500 check to initiate a retainer with exclusivity, 30%, 30 day replacement within the IT department. With no HR involvement as this was the IT department’s money. Unfortunately, the HR department and their VMP  had failed to fulfill the IT Managers critical hiring needs.</p>
<p>Now, we meet the client and gather all past candidates from Managers – revisited them all discreetly and found someone who had applied directly on-line that the Manager overlooked, for a poor reason. We meet the person and “sell” them to the client as a qualified, local candidate that we need to consider. The Manager agrees, and they love him!!!!</p>
<p>Now we are getting calls from the Managers asking if HR has called us, and they have – but I did not take their call.  HR is telling Management they already had the candidate because he had applied directly, and they do not want to pay the remaining fee. The Managers are calling us and don’t know what to do. HR has gone to the top VP in IT and has been making quite a stir.</p>
<p>How can we handle this one without alienating ourselves with the overworked HR person and keep servicing what we have turned around from a great Contingency client – to an even better retained client?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Answer: First of all, congratulations to you for doing the right thing and walking away from a bad agreement in tough economic times. You showed the courage, confidence and foresight of a strong company engaging in quality work. Remember, it is easy to be the cheapest, and takes conviction to be the best!</p>
<p>This is an awesome dilemma!!! What a great opportunity for you and your firm! How fortunate you are to have HR bringing you all of this attention – and they went right to the top!! Absolutely beautiful for you, I love it!</p>
<p>Okay, for starters, you have to look at what the problem is here. You need to understand why HR is doing and reacting the way they are. The expert will tell you here and now. Ready – you have proven that <strong><em>the Vendor Management Program</em></strong> <strong><em>HR created has failed</em></strong>. You also have shown that you are capable of forging an alliance within THEIR company, and providing time and money saving services. <span style="text-decoration: underline">Remember, they get what they pay for!</span></p>
<p>Okay, now we know you may have alienated HR. However,  they created the mess with the low cost/low service program, and you respectfully declined to provide your services under the VMP. However, I am speaking amongst recruiters in this column, and can get quite blunt, be tender with your client – but be firm. Again, services levels amongst recruiting firms vary, and you are a <strong>proven quality supplier</strong> that was overlooked due to pricing issues.</p>
<p>Try this tactic: don’t take HR’s calls, let them run amok with the Managers for a week. Be reassuring to the Managers that there is NO ISSUE at all here, <strong>you are retained</strong> and we all will get the results we want – a quick fix to a year long opening AND a quality hire. I read the contract you sent &#8211;  <strong>The contract is in place</strong> – you are exclusive, terms are on the table, just <em>focus on your service and be professional</em>. You would not have been given this retainer if they did not trust you and have confidence in you so <em>stay trustworthy and confident</em> during HR’s little tornado, it is somewhat understandable that they are upset. On the other hand, they probably should have responded with enthusiasm, as you are taking away a painstaking opening and where the candidate came from is not really an issue. The client overlooked this person.</p>
<p>You knew they applied on-line, <strong>so what</strong> &#8211; sell it as an asset – they actually WANT to work at your clients firm. Hallelujah , start the on boarding process! Keep the manager aligned, remind them of why they hired your firm – <span style="text-decoration: underline">you uncover things like this candidate</span> for them. Say “<strong>this stuff happens all the time in retained</strong>!” This is how retained is now working for them. Defend HR (but don’t take their calls yet) Say “HR is to busy to discern the good from the great” they have Unions, Benefits, thousands applying for many jobs and payroll and parking, lawsuits. All we do is recruit for you, all day and all year. Reassure you will follow up with HR, but are way to busy with retained work to talk right now with HR about a sealed deal.</p>
<p>God I love this business – you should to.  Congrats on a great dilemma and good luck!</p>
<p>What’s your problem? I know you have one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/10/ask-the-expert-vendor-agreement-hr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to be in the Business Journal?</title>
		<link>http://www.waps.org/2011/09/want-to-be-in-the-business-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waps.org/2011/09/want-to-be-in-the-business-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenna Cose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waps.org/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurry!  Members, the deadline for getting your bus card into the Book of Lists is Monday, Oct 3.  Time is running short!  This is a great way to provide coverage for your firm that will be seen for the next year!    It also demonstrates that you are a relevant recruiting firm in the hot area of recruiting.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurry!  Members, the deadline for getting your bus card into the Book of Lists is Monday, Oct 3.  Time is running short!  This is a great way to provide coverage for your firm that will be seen for the next year!    It also demonstrates that you are a relevant recruiting firm in the hot area of recruiting.  Having your firm&#8217;s name there is the first step to brand awareness!  Branding!!  There&#8217;s a form on the website that needs to be sent in to the BizJournal.  They will create the artwork for you so that you are represented well.  Hurry!  Info is on the website.</p>
<p>Please download the sign up form.</p>
<p><a  title='The Business Journal Partnership Form' href='http://www.waps.org/?wpdmact=process&did=NS5ob3RsaW5r' style="background:url('http://www.waps.org/wp-content/plugins/download-manager/icon/download.png' rel='shadowbox[sbpost-354];player=img;') no-repeat;padding:3px 12px 12px 28px;font:bold 10pt verdana;">Download</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waps.org/2011/09/want-to-be-in-the-business-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

